From petrapez and bring back their rights and their wealth, which have been stolen by the West and the current competitive authoritarian regimes.
"It is the West and the regimes that have hampered the development of these people and deprived them of their wealth.
What we need is to gain our wealth back to shape the development of our state and to win back our freedom - which we think is important to us and not important for the West.
so Musalli on the situation in the Arab region. (1) take the this specific press releases from the newspaper al-Youm
from Libya to the legitimate retrieving the wealth most of dangerous proportions and form at this stage explosive bomb, because in these, it's about "Canned" of Western interests - oil . The security of oil supplies provide enough reason for a military intervention by NATO under a UN mandate on flimsy grounds.
"Almost all the oil fields are east of Ras Lanuf now controlled by the people and the government has no control in this area, "
, Najib was quoted Abdessalam, a petroleum engineer, the Libyan company AGICO. Exports had been set too well how - these messages do not serve the democratic people's movement in Libya, but are an attack on the heads of the local European population, since the same time, oil prices would rise on the world market - it is a proven agent of manipulation by fear from high prices of heating oil and fuel costs. The call for "the order creating military intervention" is accepted and not as the recognized what it is: a military invasion and interference in the internal affairs of a country. Political commentator Ralph
Shoenman
of Los Angeles said:
"The goal of U.S. intervention in Libya is to receive the revolutionary upsurge of the masses and using it as a forward base for the introduction of troops.
The people of Libya are not from the U.S. intervention or intervention of NATO, on the contrary, their struggle for control of its sovereignty and its resources will be frustrated by these companies to recover them for themselves.
Wherever they go, be they never left. Try a country where there were no fixed bases and were used in the U.S. or NATO troops to call. You go in and stay to control resources, to establish puppet regimes and to subjugate the people. "
(3)
The video with the U.S. Analyses Ralph Shoenman the situation with lots of background information, such as the role of
General Dynamics and interdependence of the military-industrial complex,
here is heard in the original, in addition, the entire Text of interview published in the English language. Shoenman, born 1935, is an American left-wing activist and was involved in many hochangebundenen political projects of disarmament and prosecution of war crimes - like the genocide in Vietnam by U.S. troops - involved. Since 2002 collaborates Ralph Shoenman with the documentary filmmaker Mya Shone and offers comments on radio stations in many parts of the United States and Canada, where the "compromise settlement, figures and intensive exposés of the hidden workings of a capitalist system" been identified, the "addicted to permanent war" is. Mya Shone and Ralph Schoenman three years ago:
Rasmussen: NATO intervention in Libya "should take place with a UN mandate" 02/24/2011 RINGS TO LIBYA (I) : EU active intervention mechanism |
| http://www.presstv.ir/detail/167277.html (2) | http://www.sify.com/news/Protesters- Gain control over Libyan-oil-news-lc1rOfbbceg.html ref = content_widget_news
02/24/2011
0 comments:
Post a Comment